It is an ugly time to go online. Now, I hate conflict of any sort, but online conflict is the worst. Somehow because you’re not directly in front of a person, they seem to be able to ignore your humanity, and often their own. I hate this so much that last week I was about to submit a post to a website where I regularly contribute when I discovered that another author had written a post making the opposite point–on the same site. Rather than seem to be attacking a total stranger, I tabled my post, wrote in for an extension, and stayed up until 3am the next night to get it all done. Conflict successfully avoided!
The next day, I wrote a post decrying Donald Trump. Good job avoiding controversy and online drama, Meg.
Good job avoiding controversy and online drama, Meg.
In the aftermath, which hasn’t been quite as unpleasant as I expected, I’ve had the opportunity to watch people rage and condescend and talk over each other ad infinitum. I’ve been lurking in the comments sections on people’s Facebook posts, where I’ve watched people who actually know each other treat each other like garbage in the name of politicians who they themselves don’t even like. I’ve been called a dishonest crook (which is, by the way, a ridiculous insult and entirely off topic) for being a Democrat, which anyone with Google or any reading comprehension skills can see that I’m not.1
And this, friends, is from self-proclaimed Christians. This is from people I otherwise respect. These are comments directed not at strangers but at neighbors and family members and co-workers.
This profanes the name of Jesus.
It profanes his name quite literally at times. I saw a good priest called a “Catholic” (in quotation marks) because he suggested a third party candidate. One woman shared her experience of sexual assault and was told, “Any Bible believer who does not vote for the Republican candidate is a hypocrite,” to which the response, of course, was “Jesus was a liberal!”2
It’s appalling. I would think any person of good will would see that. But since many of us seem to have forgotten how to treat each other like human beings when we’re not looking each other in the eye, I thought it might be helpful to have some guidelines for discerning how to reply to people’s controversial opinions online.
1. Read. Please don’t respond to a post without reading the article and all the comments that precede yours.3 I can’t tell you how much unnecessary strife I’ve seen because people are making arguments that have clearly been settled by the linked article or because they’re responding to the quotation shared by the poster without reading the context. Before you comment, make sure you know what you’re responding to.
2. Reread. Part of why arguments online are almost always fruitless and divisive is that people misread each other. There’s no tone or body language to help us interpret people’s words and so we often put the worst possible spin on things. Before you assume someone is being callous or dismissive or rude, reread their comment. Try it in different tones of voice and with different emphases. Is there any way of reading it that can be viewed as less offensive? Assume that was their intent and respond as though they were unclear, not uncharitable. My friend’s husband frequently reminds her: “Never attribute malice or contempt to what can be explained by ignorance or incompetence”–or by pain or confusion or any number of other motivations we can’t possibly know.
3. Respect. Remind yourself that this is a human being you’re talking to, a person desperately loved by God, a soul whom you hope to spend eternity with. This is not an ideology or a platform or a robot, this is a soul. And even if you know this person well, you don’t know everything about him. Don’t say things you don’t want repeated at your funeral. Don’t level accusations you aren’t certain about. If you wouldn’t say it to his face, don’t type it.
4. Rephrase. Don’t just write something angry or controversial and post it immediately. Stop and look it over again. Ask yourself if the language you use is unnecessarily combative. Can you make your point without calling her Killary or him an ass? Because nasty language doesn’t further dialogue. Are you speaking courteously? Do you show respect for the intelligence and goodwill of the people with whom you’re debating? Do you need those extra question marks??? Maybe you could add a friendly emoticon or a kind note like, “Thanks for your question!” or, “I really appreciate your response.” Consider how someone else might read your response and rephrase it to be as charitable as possible.4 I find it helpful to ask myself if I want this to be the last thing I ever say to this person. If I’d be ashamed to have spoken that way, it needs some tweaking.
5. Reconsider. Are you adding anything to the conversation? Are you clarifying any points or just hurling accusations? Is the person you’re addressing willing to listen? Or are you just increasing the strife and division in the world? When I’ve got a tough comment to write or email to send, I generally write it in a draft, then leave it for a few hours. If it still seems like a reasonable response when things have settled, when I’m less frustrated and have prayed about it, I send it. If not, I figure that by this point nobody was expecting a response anyway. It’s also worth considering that some conversations do need to happen but should happen in a private message, not a public forum where people are being scandalized or contributing divisive commentary. If it’s sensitive, keep it private.
6. Remember:
- This is not that important. With very rare exception, nobody’s salvation hangs in the balance; if it does, get the heck off the internet and have that conversation in person!
- You don’t have to win. At a certain point, it might be best to remove yourself from the conversation.
- Backing off doesn’t mean you’ve lost.5
- It’s okay to change your mind.
- The greatest victory a Christian can celebrate is sincere repentance for wrongdoing; now might be a good time to look back over your recent conversations and ask forgiveness.
- There is nothing more important than prayer. Not argument, not research, not clever phrasing. Pray more than you type and you should be okay.
I’m certainly not the poster child for how to argue well online; my approach is usually to pen some scathing retort worthy of an Austenian heroine and then refuse to post it because I’m terrified of your reaction. But I think that by being deliberate and prayerful, treating our online interactions as human interactions, and assuming people’s intentions are good, we can fight for charity in this broken world of ours. Will you join me?
- Not a Republican either. [↩]
- Both obviously untrue, at least in the way they meant the words. [↩]
- I suppose if you’re commenting on a public figure’s post and it has hundreds of comments you don’t have to read them all. But really, what are you trying to accomplish in that case? Nobody else is reading them either. [↩]
- Pro tip: sarcasm is generally a bad idea when you’re online and people’s hackles are already up. [↩]
- I recently ended a comment this way: “And now, friend, I will excuse myself from this conversation. Thank you for your respectful tone. God bless you!” [↩]
Thumbs up 🙂
Great post! I’ve removed myself from Facebook until the election is over because of all the hate and negativity flying around. It pains me to see human beings treating one another in such mean ways.
Well said, I have found that commenting only gets it off my chest and then after contemplating what and how to say it I am not going to convince anybody to change because of my view point so I just share others and people can take them or leave them. In the end it becomes a relationship between God and me, He is the One I am trying to convince!
Great article, not just for the election but on commenting in general these are some really great tips which I will admit I’ve struggled with a lot so thanks for the great reminder.
Me too! (What Nathaniel said)
These are great principles for any online discussion. Sadly many online discussions end in verbal abuse, and some begin with it. There is the great tradition of the disputatio in the Catholic Church, especially amongst Dominicans, where the purpose is to discover truth and to deepen understanding of God’s revelation. All contributors are treated with respect in this process, even if they disagree, because all contributors genuinely seek the truth. If love and humility are at the heart of a discussion, cruel and hurtful comments will be impossible.
I agree with all the above statements. It is so important to be charitable toward others, especially those who have a different opinion. Why act in a way that that is hateful and causes a verbal inferno?
Love it!
Hurray to you Meg!
Your opening comments brought tears to my eyes…being 50+ years old I have seen the political world heat up like a volcano-and although this hasn’t exactly erupted it’s pretty close. The media is feeding the frenzy and so are the PACs and other big campaign contributors. What we need to do is turn our TV’s off and do a bit more praying and reading. Nothing anyone says is going to change our already made up minds so why listen to the frenzy? Long ago my father said to me, “Never write anything down that you’ll later be ashamed of.” That goes for saying things too, because names do hurt and as Christians we should be building people up-not tearing them apart. We will never lead people to Christ by being hateful.
I’ve loved both your posts on this topic. I practically never post about politics on social media, or comment about it, except on very rare occasions, but I’ve seen exactly the behavior or you describe among some of my own friends, vilifying each other over this crazy election, and it saddens me.
Also, “my approach is usually to pen some scathing retort worthy of an Austenian heroine and then refuse to post it because I’m terrified of (the) reaction” more or less much describes my life…